<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>OHH!</title>
      <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/</link>
      <description>Olympia Held Hostage
Welcome to our discussion of events in Olympia. It&apos;s a land where Democrats have total control and have had one-party control of the governor&apos;s mansion and government agencies longer than any other state in the nation. </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:58:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Marr Aims to Ban Studded Tires</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In the dead of winter, Senator Chris <a href="http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2009/feb/24/studded-tires-not-worth-cost-to-states-roads/">Marr has pushed forward</a> one of the most ill-considered ideas for Washington state transportation in a generation.
Marr is the sponsor of a bill to permanently ban studded tires in Washington. It's a crazy idea, but even more bizarre coming from Marr, who is supposed to represent Spokane -- where icy conditions make studded tires necessary.
According to the Spokesman article, Marr wasn't certain the bill would pass the Legislature, but he noted that it would pass easily if it were put on the ballot as an initiative -- because Western Washington voters would vote yes.<blockquote>If not, he said, the issue may be taken out of the hands of lawmakers. Western Washington voters would almost certainly back an immediate ban, Marr believes.
"You could put this up as a ballot measure and it would pass instantly," he said.
</blockquote> Too bad for the silly voters in Spokane who voted for Marr.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/03/marr_aims_to_ban_studded_tires.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/03/marr_aims_to_ban_studded_tires.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Eight Billion and Counting</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The state budget deficit is now <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2009/02/20/2008766813.pdf">more than eight billion dollars</a>, according to Arun Raha, the state's chief revenue forecaster, in a preview of the official March forecast. 
Here's what the <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2008765126_revenue20m.html">Seattle Times article</a> said:
<blockquote>Washington state forecasters had previously projected a nearly $6 billion shortfall. Thursday's preliminary forecast shows an additional $721 million gap in the current two-year budget and $1.6 billion more in the next biennium that starts in July. That pushed the overall shortfall to $8 billion.</blockquote>Still, we shouldn't forget, it is an increase in spending. It's more revenue than the last two-year budget, but much less than the Democrats had hoped to spend.
Eric Earling, at <a href="http://soundpolitics.com/archives/012597.html">Sound Politics</a> remembers that something about that $8 billion rings a bell ... it's the amount spending increased during Gregoire's first term.
It would be nice if someone had a list of the moron legislators who voted for those spending increases. Here's just such a list: <a href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=231606">the Senate</a>, and <a href="http://www.washingtonvotes.org/RollCall.aspx?ID=231607">House</a> votes when the last two-year budget was approved.


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/02/eight_billion_and_counting.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/02/eight_billion_and_counting.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Taxes and Budget</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>AG warns against Gag Law</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Attorney General Rob McKenna's office quietly released an informal Attorney General's opinion today that knocked the wind out of Senate Bill 5446, the employer gag law.
The law "Prohibiting certain employer communications about political or religious matters" has caused a stir in Olympia because it is clearly aimed at hobbling employers and threatens to seriously worsen Washington's already dismal business climate.
The list of those testifying for and against the bill is a Who's Who of business and labor:
<blockquote>Persons Testifying: PRO: Rick Bender, WSLC; Diana Zahn, UFCW 21; Tom Wroblewski, IAM
CON:  AWB; Boeing Company; Washington Roundtable; NFIB; Association Builders & Contractors.</blockquote>The<a href="http://www.libertylive.org/files/pdf/Hewitt%20Informal%20Opinion%202-17-09%20(SB%205446).pdf"> informal AGO</a> states federal law preempts the state from interfering in labor relations.
Perhaps Senators Prentice, Kohl-Welles, Keiser, McDermott, Fairley, Franklin, Kline,
Murray, Ranker, Tom, Shin, Regala, Hobbs, Kauffman, Pridemore, McAuliffe, Kastama,
Hatfield, Oemig, Fraser and Jacobsen will need to find a different way to ingratiate themselves with state labor leaders.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/02/ag_warns_against_gag_law.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/02/ag_warns_against_gag_law.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Kauffman joins &quot;Billionaire Club&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[According to the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's list of <a href="http://www.effwa.org/main/article.php?article_id=2679">Big Spenders</a>, Senator Claudia Kauffman is now one of the most expensive legislators in Olympia, with over $2 billion in new taxes and fees proposed this year.
She now joins the company of the fiscally reckless Maralyn Chase, Adam Kline, and Jeanne Kohl-Wells.
The list is compiled by EFF from the fiscal notes produced by the state Office of Financial Management as a result of Initiative 960 which requires the state to keep track of the ten-year cost of all proposed legislation.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/02/kauffman_joins_billionaire_clu.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/02/kauffman_joins_billionaire_clu.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Taxes and Budget</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Double Whammy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[That's the <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/PDF/frontpage.pdf">headline</a> in today's Seattle Times, about the announcement by two major Washington businesses that they were laying off more employees - 10,000 at Boeing and 6,700 at Starbucks.
Coming on the same day -- and just a short time after Microsoft announced layoffs -- brings home how fragile the economy has become. 
For Washington state legislators, its another warning sign that the budget deficit -- now pegged at $6.5 billion is likely to grow to over $7 billion, or $7.5 billion or more.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/double_whammy.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/double_whammy.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Time for an Income Tax?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Senator Rosa Franklin introduced <a href="http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=11&sid=126698">an income tax today</a>, as reported by the KIRO website:<blockquote>The idea of a state income tax is back on the table again.
Senator Rosa Franklin (D) says it's time to revamp the entire tax system and talk about a more sustainable way of funding the state budget.
Franklin would like to put a bill before the voters in the next general election. "Whenever you mention taxes, nobody likes to pay taxes. My goal in putting it forward is to have a discussion," Franklin told KIRO Radio's Dori Monson. </blockquote>The odds are against it becoming law this year, but it does point to the problem at the center of this year's session: either serious cuts or tax increases are needed ... and the Legislature is prohibited from raising taxes without either a two-thirds vote or a vote of the people.
Yet, there's little serious action to resolve the problem pending word from the President one wag referred to as "Obama Claus" about federal aid to Washington state. Will it be a billion? Two billion? Road funds? Medicare funds? 
Budget writers are also waiting anxiously for Washington's own updated budget forecast later in the session. 
In the meantime, Democrats pine for an income tax, promising it would bring stability and fairness -- traits they have failed to notice are absent from the federal tax system.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/time_for_an_income_tax.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/time_for_an_income_tax.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Taxes and Budget</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Planning for the Next Rainy Day</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Senator Joe Zarelli, R-Ridgefield, proposed <a href="http://src.leg.wa.gov/news/2009/Zarelli/012109ConstitutionalAmendment.htm">a better Rainy Day fund</a> for the future. Just like his original Rainy Day Fund legislation, this one has drawn support from Democrats:
<blockquote>Senate Joint Resolution 8209 already has gained bipartisan support, with Sen. Lisa Brown, Senate Democrat leader, at the top of the list of co-sponsors. She worked with Zarelli in 2007 to get the rainy-day fund amendment put on that year’s ballot, where it passed overwhelmingly. 
</blockquote>The proposal automatically sends revenue in excess of 133 percent of the 10-year average into the constitutional Rainy Day Fund. When there are sharp revenue spikes -- such as the 21 percent increase in 2005-2007, the Legislature would be forced to save part of it. It's explained here in one of Zarelli's excellent "<a href="http://www.senaterepublicans.wa.gov/news/2009/Zarelli/011509BudgetTibit.pdf">Budget Tidbits</a>."]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/planning_for_the_next_rainy_da.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/planning_for_the_next_rainy_da.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>REALLY? A budget deficit?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In the <a href="http://tvw.org/search/siteSearch.cfm?EvntType=C&keywords=House%20Ways&date=2009&bhcp=1">House Ways and Means hearing on the budget</a> the first week of the 2009 session, the head of Governor Gregoire's budget office gave this testimony:
 <blockquote>"We knew prior to the November forecast that we would have a shortfall of more than $3 billion."  -- Victor Moore, Director, Office of Financial Management (OFM) in Monday's (1/12/09) House Ways and Means hearing.
 </blockquote>

With apologies to Amy Poehler and Seth Meyers:
 
"REALLY?"  You knew about a $3 billion deficit before the November 12th revenue forecast?  
 
REALLY?  And up until the election on November 4th your boss, Christine Gregoire, was saying that we were one of the few states in the union that had a surplus.  
 
REALLY?  And Gregoire was also saying we were 'the envy of the country!'
 
REALLY?  A surplus?  One day we had a surplus and a week later we had a $3 billion deficit?
 
REALLY?  What did we lose some change in the seat cushions?
 
REALLY?  Did we go a little crazy buying cranberry sauce for the Governor's mansion Thanksgiving dinner?  THREE BILLION dollars in one week?
 
REALLY?  

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/really_a_budget_deficit.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/really_a_budget_deficit.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Gregoire&apos;s Second Inaugural</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Gregoire gave her Second Inaugural address today, and although pleasant, it was lacking in detail. Lincoln's Second Inaugural sets a high standard:
<blockquote>With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds</blockquote> <a href="http://www.governor.wa.gov/speeches/speech-view.asp?SpeechSeq=203">Gregoire's rhetoric</a> did not scale these heights, but she was clearly happy to have won this past election, with no recounts marring her speech. She called for generosity and courage in facing a rapidly deteriorating economy. 
The P-I noted h<a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/396147_gregoire15.html">er speech was a call for bipartisan action</a>:
<blockquote>Despite a bleak financial outlook, Gregoire said this is a time to seize the "huge opportunity" also at hand.
"More than ever, the people of Washington do not want partisan politics. They want us to work together to build a better state for them and their children," she said. "So I will challenge all of us today -- and throughout the session -- to join together. Let's use this crisis. Let's summon the courage to make the hard decisions."</blockquote> Republicans were happy to hear her say that there should be no more "sacred cows" in budgeting and Democrats were heartened by her pledge to expand unemployment benefits and to create a jobs program. But, the short speech was lacking in the specifics legislators need to form a judgment. The expression "the devil is in the details" might have been coined to describe legislation, where one word can reverse the effect of a 200-page law.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/gregoires_second_inaugural.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/gregoires_second_inaugural.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Legislative Action</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A Bore - ing Decision</title>
         <description><![CDATA[After two years of hand-wringing, the Governor and her fellow travelers have finally <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008622393_webviaduct13m.html">agreed on a deep-bore tunnel</a> to replace the earthquake damaged Alaskan Way Viaduct. It's a remarkably good decision. 
It's good for all the reasons outlined two years ago when Sen. Cheryl Pflug (R-Maple Valley) suggested the same thing. It will allow construction to proceed without disrupting downtown and waterfront traffic, it opens up the waterfront, and it is cost-effective.
What's remarkable about the decision is that the state, city, and county politicians had to go through two years of meaningless studies, public hearings, and even a phony ballot proposition for Seattle, before finally reaching this announcement.
Now, hopefully, our elected leaders can get into the diamond lane and move forward quickly, together, without any more detours.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/a_bore_ing_decision.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/a_bore_ing_decision.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Transportation</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pomp and Circumstance as New Members Sworn In</title>
         <description>The start of the Legislative session is one of the few occasions for pomp and circumstance in Olympia’s marble halls – it is more likely to be the site of hushed phone calls and assemblies of children than of honor guards and formal presentations.

New members of the Legislature were sworn in today. Most were taking over open seats, after the incumbent retired. But there were a few who defeated sitting members. 

The Senate had only one “giant killer” -- Senator Randi Becker (R-Second District), from South Pierce County, who defeated 22-year veteran Marilyn Rasmussen. 

On the House side, there were musical chairs in Spokane’s swing Sixth District.  John Driscoll (D-6th District) is replacing the doorbelling dynamo Republican John Ahern. In the same Sixth District, coffee entrepreneur Kevin Parker replaced the incumbent Democrat, Don Barlow.  

In SW Washington, the legislative embarrassment known as Jim Dunn was defeated in the primary by Joseph James, who in turn was defeated by Democrat Tim Probst in the general. In Snohomish County, Republican Mike Hope defeated Liz Loomis.

There were other hard fought contests, but these races that defeat incumbents are the most essential for a healthy democracy. Most incumbents lose not because they have stuck their necks out on a matter of principle -- but because they have aged, grown tired, or distanced from the community that elected them. The survivors -- tough old dogs like Sen. Bob McCaslin and Mary Margaret Haugen -- stay in touch with their districts and work hard.

The House Republicans had not gained a seat since 1994, so there were plenty of smiles to go around today as they added one new member.
</description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/pomp_and_circumstance_as_new_m.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/pomp_and_circumstance_as_new_m.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Legislative Action</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Can the Seattle P-I really disappear?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[One more sign that this recession is different than we've seen before: it looks like the <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/395463_newspapersale10.html">Seattle P-I may stop publishing</a>. 
<blockquote>The Seattle P-I is being put up for sale, and if after 60 days it has not sold, it will either be turned into a Web-only publication with a greatly reduced staff or discontinued entirely.</blockquote> Apparently the P-I lost $14 million this year.
It's hard to lament the passing of a newspaper that consistently editorializes in favor of higher taxes and spending ... and yet ...
The P-I's announcement came the same day that Boeing announced lay-offs so it drives home that the national recession has now made its way to the Puget Sound area. 
When the King County Journal disappeared, it diminished local politics on the Eastside. Legislators in the Puget Sound area are hit especially hard without local news coverage since television and national outlets prefer to cover Congressional and gubernatorial news.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/can_the_seattle_pi_really_disa_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/can_the_seattle_pi_really_disa_1.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Culture</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Walla Walla Union Bulletin criticizes Oregon Mileage Tax Plan</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Oregon is in the news again with their proposal to replace the gas tax with a tax on drivers for every mile they drive. Some legislators here in Washington think it's a good idea, but it would have the bizarre effect of reducing taxes for drivers who drive gas-guzzling cars and trucks. Other problems are explained in this editorial:
<blockquote><strong>Plan to track and tax mileage of Oregonians is outrageous </strong>
<em>The technology needed for this plan could someday be used to track where motorists drive.</em>
By the Union-Bulletin Editorial Board

Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski is out of touch with reality if he believes Oregonians will tolerate his plan to equip every vehicle in the state with a GPS system so that it can be tracked by the government as a way to impose a mileage tax.

The proposal is a disaster on several levels.

Most troubling is the threat this government surveillance poses to our privacy. The state Department of Transportation official in charge of the project assured the Albany Democrat-Republican newspaper, which was the first to report on the proposal, that the technology would not be used to track where motorists go, only how many miles they drive.

Tracking locations might not be in the plans now, but that doesn't mean it won't happen sooner or later. When the technology (and temptation) is there, abuses happen.

Beyond that -- which is difficult to get beyond -- taxing mileage doesn't seem as fair as the gasoline tax. The purpose of the gas tax in Oregon and elsewhere is a user fee. Those who use the roads should pay to use them.

No, a gasoline tax isn't perfect, but it generally forces those with larger vehicles, those that create the most wear and tear on the roadways, to pay more than those with little vehicles. In addition, the gasoline tax is assessed on all who drive on Oregon's roads, not just on those who live in the state.

But this plan wouldn't replace the gasol ine tax, only reduce it a few pennies. And how long would it be before the slight savings are gone and the overall tax cost is higher? One year, two years?
Finally, this plan is predicated on the project's task force partnering "with auto manufacturers to refine technology that would enable Oregonians to pay for the transportation system based on how many miles they drive."

Hmmm, does Kulongoski or anybody else at the capital think that U.S. automakers are going to put one penny into this effort as they struggle to stay in business? If they do, Oregon has even bigger problems than this outrageous proposal.

Oregonians don't want Big Brother Kulongoski or anybody else knowing where they go and when they go there. It's as simple as that.

This proposal should be rejected.
</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/walla_walla_union_bulletin_cri.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/walla_walla_union_bulletin_cri.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Seattle P-I: &quot;Gregoire&apos;s Cuts Mirror Rossi&apos;s&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Everyone in Olympia knew that once the election was over, Gov. Chris Gregoire would need to start talking honestly about the state budget. What's surprising is that it is the P-I who is noting the obvious: <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/394881_gregoire06.html">Gregoire's Cuts Mirror Rossi's</a>
<blockquote>OLYMPIA -- During her re-election campaign, Gov. Chris Gregoire blasted Republican challenger Dino Rossi for decisions he made as the Senate's lead budget writer in 2003 -- such as suspending teacher pay raises mandated by voter initiative and cutting funding for children's health care.
Gregoire said such moves were out of step with Washington's values.
But after winning re-election Gregoire proposed balancing the next state budget with the same types of cuts -- suspended pay raises and reduced eligibility for children's health coverage.
</blockquote>
Rossi discussed the need to rein in the budget from the day he announced he was running -- along with Senator Joe Zarelli who has been a consistent voice of reason in legislative budget debates.
In the article, Rossi predicts that the Democrats are planning a tax increase vote in November.
<blockquote>Rossi said the budget sets up an end game in which the Legislature can ask voters to approve new taxes.
"In the end, if they really get weak-kneed, which they probably will, they are going to shift out things that people want instead of facing up to some of the constituencies that helped get them elected and call for a tax increase to pay for it," he said.
By creating a new tax proposal with a referendum, Democrats can shield themselves from political fallout because the burden moves to the voters, he said.</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/seattle_pi_gregoires_cuts_mirr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2009/01/seattle_pi_gregoires_cuts_mirr.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Taxes and Budget</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 03:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>When &apos;I won&apos;t raise taxes&apos; really means &apos;They&apos;ll be raised, just not by me&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Lately we've been hearing all the happy talk from Gov. Gregoire about how she promises <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/governorsrace/2008357470_elexgovernor06m.html">not to raise taxes</a>. Just because she broke that promise after the last election doesn't mean she'll do it again, right?

Wrong. Here's the catch (and with this administration there is always a catch):  the Legislature can still raise taxes without her so much as having her fingerprints on it. Why? Because under the provisions of Initiative 960, passed by voters in 2007, here is what happens if the Legislature wants to raise taxes:

<blockquote>• It can do so with a 50-percent-plus vote of the Senate and House, and then of the people; or

• Two-thirds of the Senate and House members vote to raise taxes and the public can repeal them by referendum; or 

• Two-thirds of the Senate and House members vote to raise taxes and declare it a public emergency, which takes away the people's right of referendum. At the next general election the public can vote on the idea via a nonbinding advisory ballot.</blockquote>

Here's the kicker:  under these scenarios, guess who does not have to sign these tax increases? You guessed it - the governor!. She's off the hook. Thus, her ability to say <em>she </em>won't raise taxes. It'll just be the Legislature that does it. 

It's things like this that illustrate so perfectly why one-party rule is inherently dangerous. What the public thinks it's seeing isn't really what's happening at all. It's all been decided behind closed doors who will be the good cop and who will be the bad cop, and then it's marketed to the public in an orchestrated way. Here's a look <a href="http://blogs.thenewstribune.com/politics/2008/10/08/senate_democrats_if_someone_asks_you_if_">behind the scenes </a>on how this happens. 

Sorry, folks. This is already a done deal. Tax increases are on their way, and when they happen the governor will say they weren't her fault because she didn't have to sign them into law. What could be more perfect?  

Welcome to the wonderful world of Olympia!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2008/11/when_i_wont_raise_taxes_really_means_theyll_be_raised_just_not_by_me.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.olympiaheldhostage.com/2008/11/when_i_wont_raise_taxes_really_means_theyll_be_raised_just_not_by_me.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
